One Common Language Essay

According to an eleventh light speed Arab writer, Ibn-e-Hazm, in the beginning there existed a genius voice communication given by God, thanks to which Adam was able to insure the quiddity of things. Over the chequered storey of mankind, the fragmentation of this unique tongue that existed abinitio gave ascending to a multitude of diverse rows. An desegregation of alone in all these, or a oversight to a mavin language would yield several repercussions. The fundamental benefits of a single initiation language be pragmatic. A common language would dissolve all communication barriers and increase mutual appreciation between plurality and the man over. such(prenominal) an environment would be conducive to worldly concern peace and the end of conflicts. Economic prosperity would be facilitated as business partners argon able to communicate freely, leading to a growth of international trade. Xenophobia and other link human fears would be eliminated as people are united under wizard language.This would undermine at least nigh racism or ethno-centrism as societies break more egalitarian in their scene on foreign individuals. On the heathenish front, a unique tongue would contrive redundant the need to translate plant of literature or to subtitle/ knight movies. The dissemination of knowledge and information could be done freely and in all parts of the globe, as the worlds comprehension of different cultures rises. However, there are some drawbacks of a single world language. The convenience of a single language with its resulting blandness would not make for a full life. Language is more than unspoilt a communication of needs, it is a comment of the social, historical and cultural milieu of hunting lodge and is therefore a sacred institution. By restricting the modes of human expression to a single language we would be stultifying, suppress and suffocating mans thirst to be creative. The limits of my language are the limits of my world, as someone once capably noted.Also, in a manner quasi(prenominal) to the particular depicted in George Orwells Nineteen Eighty-four, a single language is a dangerous situation as it may put disproportional power into the few hands authoritative the medium. Although the implementation of a single language is an achievable target, the situation is bound to be transient and impossible to maintain in the long run. Cultural differences between societies cash in ones chips language. This is proven by the distinct cultures of the countries utter the same language.Hence, although the same language, English, as speak in Canada for instance, is dissimilar to that spoken in the United Kingdom, the United States of Australia. Also, the culture of a country may be undisturbed of several sub-cultures each with its own language. The kinfolk of the Queens English the UK is where English, Gaelic, Welsh, Punjabi, Bengali and Urdu, all coexist. Another obstacle in achieving this target of common language is semipolitical pride, which could create conflict between nations, when the option of a dominant language is beingness made. In the light of the above discussion, I would suggest that if we are to succeed economically, socially, culturally and politically, then the world must report plurilinguism. The future is a multi-lingual one.